Monday, November 26, 2012
For Research Methods (On Critically Conscious Research: Approaches to Language and Literacy Research)
Monday, November 12, 2012
For Research Methods (On Critically Conscious Research: Approaches to Language and Literacy Research)
Where to begin? There is so much information covered in this section 500 words just isn't enough to cover it all. There were a couple of parts that stood out to me the most. First, was the part about CDA--mainly because Dr. P. had us write one about a movie for class last year. Thinking critically about a movie takes all of the fun out of it--you develop this critical consciousness and have a heightened sense of awareness to everything. Next thing you know, every movie, every TV show, every commercial is racist and sexist and homophobic, and you're walking around in awe of how much of this stuff you were completely oblivious to. For example, Dr. P. had us read an article he wrote about the movie Shrek. I wasn't really interested in the movie before, but I never thought about it beyond it being a kid's movie with Eddie Murphy playing a stupid donkey. After reading his article, I was amazed at how much racism I missed and had to go back and watch the movie. You can check out the article here.
Critical ethnography also got my attention. I wish there was more information on it, but the little overview made me want to do some more research into it. I liked Quartz's idea that critical ethnography "attempts to re-present the 'culture', the 'consciousness', or the 'lived experiences' of people living in asymmetrical power relations" (Willis et. al 55). In particular, I like the use of the word "re-present" instead of represent. Instead of trying to speak for that group of people, you are using their own words to present their culture, consciousness, and experiences. Big difference to me. The one thing that does bother me about this is how women and non-whites keep getting left out of the equation. How is it possible to focus on oppression, or oppressed people and not take their contributions into consideration?
The critically conscious study of whiteness and sexual orientation both interested me as well. I am a huge fan of Tim Wise (which is why I will post his video below), and for some reason language and sexual orientation both confuse and interest me. I think this is largely due to the fact that this is still new to me, but I am also realizing that I am at a disadvantage when talking to homosexual and transsexual people. It's has more to do with identity and language, but I've found that the lines aren't as clear to me as when I am dealing with something like race. Anyway, since I love visuals I wanted to add the Tim Wise video on whiteness. Hope you like it.
Tuesday, November 6, 2012
For Research Methods (On Critically Conscious Research: Approaches to Language and Literacy Research)
For some reason, Hegel's Master/Slave relationship example stuck in my mind while I was reading. Immediately, my mind went to chattel slavery and colonialism. It amazes me that Hegel could make this association with consciousness, but still believe that black people "had not historically or intellectually evolved to consciousness and, at best, could only seek to imitate White males" (Willis et al. 9). How can Hegel acknowledge that consciousness comes from this type of relationship, and the desire for freedom, but not acknowledge the consciousness of black people who were slaves, or victims of colonial oppression? I particularly appreciated Fanon's response that basically argues black people have their own consciousness that is unique (not universal) to their experience of oppression, and not merely an imitation of white people: "I am wholly what I am. I do not have to look for the universal...My Negro consciousness does not hold itself out as a lack. It is. It is its own follower." (qtd. in Willis et al. 21).
His misunderstandings of Black consciousness (while understandable), do seem to reflect his own racism--if only in his concept of Universality. However, the book does point out that there is a "universalistic position" in the Master/Slave relationship where "slaves become conscious of their masters' dependency on the slaves' labor and obedience" (Willis et al. 10). Of course, when you add chattel slavery and good ole Willie Lynch to the equation, it seems rather difficult to make this position universalistic. In fact, it makes Hegel's idea of imitation a tad bit more palatable in the sense that American slaves didn't fully "develop a personal sense of reality based on new understandings" (Willis et al. 10). In other words, the Master used language as a tool of oppression in order to "inculcate dominant ideologies through speech and literature in the lives of the less powerful" (Willis et al. 22), and it is this dominant ideology that would be the foundation of the American slaves' understanding. The American slave, in particular, would have his/her reality shaped by, based on, the understanding of white people from the moment they were brought to this country and stripped of their own culture, language, etc., and given the language/literature of their oppressors. This is another reason I love Fanon :-).
So, seeing as how I'm a visual person, I'm really tired, and I haven't had the opportunity to throw a video in on these posts as of yet. I found a video on Fanon. It talks about some of this stuff in there. Hope you like it.
Monday, October 29, 2012
For Research Methods (On the case: Approaches to Language and Literacy Research by Dyson and Genishi)
Monday, October 15, 2012
For Research Methods (On the case: Approaches to Language and Literacy Research by Dyson and Genishi)
Sunday, September 30, 2012
For Research Methods (Research Design by Creswell and On the Case: Approaches to Language and Literacy Research by Dyson and Genishi)
Monday, September 24, 2012
For Research Methods (Research Design by Creswell)
Monday, September 17, 2012
For Research Methods (Research Design by Creswell)
I have been reading proposals to get an idea of what I need to do for my thesis proposal. I have to admit that I have been really confused. These three chapters have actually helped me understand what I am supposed to be doing. I still have some questions specific to my project, but at least I know how to start. One thing that I have noticed is that I have quantitative research on the brain. I am used to doing research in psychology, and it is a lot different than what I will be doing in my thesis. I think that since I want to think in quantitative, while doing qualitative research is probably what is confusing me.
The introduction chapter is pretty straight forward. The deficiencies model makes things so much easier to outline. In qualitative research, the researcher explores the problem through a particular theoretical lens, and may use personal experiences ( 98-99). I found this to be the most beneficial, because I can tell about my own experience in relation to the problem I am researching. The research problem needs to engage the reader right away, clearly identify what the problem is that is being studied, and why it is important to study it. The review of studies almost sounded like a literature review, but I think of it as establishing what research has been done and how your research adds new knowledge to what is already known. Why your research is important is the significance of a study for audiences.
The purpose statement is another area that was confusing me. Maybe this is because my idea is too broad. Anyway, I see that it basically says what you intend to find in the study, who you are studying, and where you are studying them (112). What also threw me off was that in chapter seven it says in qualitative research you use research questions instead of objectives (129). Part of the purpose statement is to state your objectives, so I was a little unsure of what it meant.
The central question of the research questions was the same way. If you have to focus on a single concept in the study, how do you then ask a very broad question about the study (129-130)? I am probably overthinking this, but it didn't seem to make sense when I was reading it.
Monday, April 30, 2012
From Computers and Writing (Computers and Writing)
I think by now you all know how much I love to add videos into my blog posts (You're welcome!). It should be no surprise to anyone that I went to YouTube to find a video that would help explain cyborg pedagogy. Unfortunately, I had trouble finding anything remotely related to it. I did find some really cheesy videos about cyborg teachers in the classroom. I actually wasn't going to post it, but i couldn't resist...
Ok, there you go...Outside of RoboTeach I did find a video essay by a student. S/he did their video on Sue Hum (Inman 105) and her quote in his book on technology and cultural gestalt. I tried to find it in the book, but I couldn't. If you find it let me know. it was actually pretty interesting. Here it is...
The last video I have is something I just wanted to throw in because I thought it was pretty cool. I can't remember what show I was watching, but this new type (or old because I'm not sure how old the show was) of android was being developed by a Japanese robotics professor named Hiroshi Ishiguro. This is like a life-like android that is supposed to feel, think, and everything humans do. It is the merging of man and machine: a cyborg. Hope you like it...
From Writing for Social Justice Blog (Latino Education Crisis)
Latino Education Videos
Just wanted to share a couple of videos I found about the author, and the subject of Latino/a education.
Thursday, April 19, 2012
From Writing for Social Justice Blog (Latino Education Crisis)
Just wanted to share a couple of videos I found about the author, and the subject of Latino/a education.
Monday, April 16, 2012
From Computers and Writing Class (Enculturation)
The article I read basically reviewed the book, Digital Griots by Adam J. Banks. I caught my interest because it talked about using Hip Hop, Ebonics, and African Storytelling in the classroom. I am really interested in using Hip Hop music to educate students, and I think it could be used in a variety of ways to teach English, music, media, and performance to name a few. Of course, I went to YouTube to see if there were any videos about it. There are a few examples of it, but the ones below made the most sense to me. I think that using music/video to tell your story is an interesting way to get students involved in their own education. I wish I could have found a good Hip Hop video example though. Maybe someone else knows of one.
I found one that was an old interview with the author about his thoughts.
Monday, April 9, 2012
From Computers and Writing Class (C&C Online)
http://www.bgsu.edu/cconline/ethics_special_issue/DEVOSS_PLATT/
Examples
Dove commercial
Beyonce
From Computers and Writing Class (Trolling)
http://colethetroll.blogspot.com/
What is trolling? According to the blog: Wikipedia states that "In Internet slang, a troll is someone who posts inflammatory,[2] extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum, chat room, or blog, with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response[3] or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion.[4] The noun troll may refer to the provocative message itself, as in: "That was an excellent troll you posted".
Check out the video
and this other article and video about a man who got jail time for trolling here...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-berkshire-14894576
For Computers and Writing (C&C and Enculturation Journals)
For Writing for Social Justice (The Latino Education Crisis)
My other problem is in the notion that minorities are being "victims" and somehow lowers their "motivation to complete on a level playing field" (36-37), as if there was, or would be, a level playing field without it. I also disagree with the notion that affirmative action gives minorities an unfair advantage and gives them an opportunity that they otherwise didn't deserve. It goes back to their being an equal playing field. If high schools were equal (and No Child Left Behind really didn't place certain children ahead others), then the minority students would be entering into college on a level playing field and the system could be based on merit instead.
Monday, April 2, 2012
For Computers and Writing Blog (Literacy in the New Media Age)
Ok, so since a couple people have asked about what idea I was playing with in my head for my next digital essay here's the links. I'm not 100% sure how I would do it, but it would be something like this...

Thursday, March 29, 2012
From Writing for Social Justice Blog (Why Are All The Black Kids Sitting Together in the Cafeteria?)
Monday, March 26, 2012
For Computers and Writing Blog (Literacy in the New Media Age)
Thursday, March 8, 2012
From Writing for Social Justice Blog (Why Are All The Black Kids Sitting Together in the Cafeteria?)
Monday, March 5, 2012
From Computers and Writing Blog (Hypertext 3.0)
Wednesday, February 29, 2012
Writing for Social Justice Group Blog
Injustice in the HEB
· First, young children often don’t know enough about health and nutrition to make informed decisions about their diet or contradict their parents’ dietary decisions.
· Second, even if children know better than to eat the unhealthy foods their parents buy, they don’t have the economic means to feed themselves. If their parents choose to buy unhealthy food despite the children’s concerns, the children must eat it or go hungry.
· Third, the unhealthy food choices parents make affect their children doubly. On one level, it’s bad for the children when they eat it. On another level, it is bad for the parents when they eat it and their poor health can have even more negative consequences for the children.
We observed between five and ten parents (single and paired), including one obviously pregnant woman, buying groceries for their families, and all but one set of them had unhealthy food and beverage products in their shopping carts. We assumed the people we observed were parents either because they had products targeted toward children in their cart or they had children shopping with them. Even when the parents had unhealthy foods in their carts, they tended to also have some healthy foods, as well. Additionally, the parents who had more children with them tended to have more unhealthy foods and drinks in their carts. The foods and beverages we viewed as unhealthy included processed foods like American cheese, chips, crackers, hot dogs and sausage, cereal, other boxed snacks, ice cream, frozen pizza, and soda. On the other hand, we considered healthy, whole foods to be products like vegetables, fruits, unprocessed meats, dairy, and eggs.
Other noteworthy observations we made concerned race and sex. Most of the parents we observed buying unhealthy foods were Hispanic. The one set of parents that had only healthy food and drink in their cart looked white, and they had three small children with them. We also noticed that, when comparing the individual female parent shoppers to the individual male parent shoppers (whether they were “single” or not), the females tended to buy more than the males, potentially playing into the stereotypical gender role of mother as homemaker. The fact that one father/son shopping duo only had about three items in their basket, in addition to the time of day we conducted our observation, might also indicate that several of these parents were merely shopping to fill in the gaps of their food stocks. There are several factors involved in these trends as well as several possible explanations behind what we observed. It would be difficult to make assumptions, however, based on the limited information we had.
That said, our primary goal in this observation was to validate our belief that parents frequently buy unhealthy foods and drinks for their families, which we were able to do. If we were to take this observation further—into “action”—we would conduct more research to find out what the patterns of parent grocery shoppers are and the reasons behind those patterns, educate the community about the importance of making healthy food choices when grocery shopping, and find other ways to take action on the issue, for example through legislature, boycotts, organization partnerships with HEB, etc.
(This blog post was collaboratively written by the three of us.)
Thursday, February 23, 2012
From Writing for Social Justice Blog (Rebel Girls)
Monday, February 20, 2012
For Computers and Writing (Hypertext 3.0)
Thursday, February 16, 2012
For Writing for Social Justice (Rebel Girls)
Monday, February 13, 2012
For Computers and Writing (Medium is the Massage)
Privacy and the Internet
A couple of things immediately jumped out at me. The idea that we are losing privacy in gaining technology is something that I keep seeing over and over in my news feeds. When it comes to the real life and death examples of the media in the lives of celebrities (i.e. Michael Jackson, Whitney Houston) the "tyrannical womb-to-tomb surveillance [is] causing a very serious dilemma between our claim to privacy and the community's need to know" (12). While many people won't have their lives scrutinized by the entire world, they can be subjected to it on a smaller scale once someone updates their facebook status. It seems that even with privacy settings there still is very little privacy online. As McLuhan writes, "the older, traditional ideas of private, isolated thoughts and actions--the patterns of mechanistic technologies--are very seriously threatened by new methods of instantaneous electric information retrieval by the electrically computerized dossier bank" (12).
This reminded me of an article I saw on a British couple that were detained by DHS for making terrorist threats on twitter. You can read about it here. I think it is rather creepy to know that everything you type is being watched, even if it is supposed to be in the country's best interest. This could explain why facebook freezes when I am talking about a controversial subject.
The readings also reminded me about another article I read where a young girl complained about her parents on facebook. Not that this is anything out of the ordinary, especially after reading McLuhan's ideas about youth. What makes it interesting is the way that the girl was caught and the resulting aftermath. The girl tried to control her privacy by using the settings to block out her parents, but forgot to block the dog. When the parents logged in to the dog's facebook page they saw the girl's post (which means she didn't take into account her global family/neighborhood had expanded to include the dog). Apparently, the father thought a suitable punishment would be to shoot the computer, and of course it made the news. The article says that the father decided to respond via facebook to the media (which is where the whole problem started) and not do interviews. To me, it illustrates McLuhan's point about propaganda ending where dialogue begins, and how you must "talk to the media, not the programmer" (142). Check out the article here.
While I'm not sure how McLuhan has addressed this same topic today. It isn't the same as once having television characters beamed into your living room. Today friends, family, strangers, and the government can downright intrude into what you think is your own personal space--even with privacy settings. People can enter your thoughts, judge them, and then leave comments to tell you how genius or insane they believe you are. I think that it is important to realize how much more relevant this information is today.
Thursday, February 9, 2012
For Writing for Social Justice (White Privilege)
Sometimes I wonder just what it is that white people are afraid of when it comes to dealing with antiracism. On the one hand I can understand how someone would fear "isolation..., ostracism..., rejection..., loss of privilege or status..., physical harm...", but part of me just doesn't get what the big deal is (Tatum 146). So it makes a white person uncomfortable to deal with their racism for a while, it makes everyone who isn't white uncomfortable all the time. The reality is that nonwhite people don't get to choose when and where we will deal with racism, and we surely don't get to take a break from being uncomfortable and go back to our regular lives. It just isn't an option.
What is an option is how we deal with the racism. Reading Tatum's article made me remember some of my frustrations with being silent in certain situations. I know that everytime I stay silent I am really disconnecting from my experience, and internalizing my own oppression (148). I think that when you realize that there is nothing you can do to stop racism from happening to you ,and the people you care about, it is easy to just give up, or get angry about it. I just want people to know "why I'm angry and not be offended by it" (149). I want people to know that it is not okay to dismiss racism as just an everyday fact of life, or say that it no longer exists. I want people to know that putting a black face on a racist act doesn't soften the blow or make it any less insulting.
Racism is an uncomfortable subject for us all. It is something that affects all of our lives. I think that it is important that we do break the silence, and not just during a particular situation. We need to have that meaningful dialogue when with one another when we are sitting at the dinner table, on the same pew, or in the same class. I myself recognize the need to understand how racism truly affects the lives of white people. I think that beginning to see how racism affects the lives of others and having a conversation about it takes us out of our comfort zones. The question is how long are we willing to be uncomfortable?
Monday, February 6, 2012
For Computers and Writing Blog (Writing Space)
I found it rather difficult to wrap my brain around the chapter on interactive fiction. I decided to search the internet for examples only to end up even more confused. I tried to find Michael Joyce's story but the only place I saw it would have made me pay for it. So, I went to YouTube for some visual examples and found Shelly Jackson's Patchwork Girl which really left me even more confused. I just don't see how it is " simultaneously dissected and 'stitched', as the author puts it, into the fabric of the narrative" (157).
The IF sites I found called them games, and they could have graphics or not. To me, the confusion sets in in what IF really is. My mind wants to make it a sort of "interactive" book where you pick what part you want to read. In this sense, Saporta's book actually kind of makes sense to me. Although I do find it somewhat weird to call it a book even though it is unbound, it's the fact that you can "shuffle [the] pages like a deck of cards" that makes it interactive like other books where you might simply flip the pages for an alternate ending (148). I think what makes this unique is that the reader alters the entire narration of the story rather than keeping it in the same order but being able to flip back and forth. I found a video sort of explaining it, but I think that being able to read it would make it a lot easier.
On the other hand, I can sort of see how it could be considered a game where you act out a story. It reminds me of the narration that is in the games I play online, but I consider these games not interactive stories. Still trying to picture this whole thing I came across another video of an example of hypertext fiction. Honestly, this confused me too because it just doesn't seem to have any order to it, but at least I could see what the book was talking about.
While I may never become a fan of interactive/hypertext fiction I think that I have a slightly better grasp on what it is. I honestly think that I am being a late age of print fuddy duddy but I am okay with that. This is somewhat beyond my comfort zone. I am wondering if anyone else had trouble understanding this chapter?
Thursday, February 2, 2012
From Writing for Social Justice Blog (White Privilege)
So, I might go over the word limit with this, but I am so tired of people playing the blame game when it comes to racism. No, not every problem that black people face has to do directly with a white person. While some issues are directly and indirectly related to racism and prejudice, sometimes a black person really didn't lose their job because of The Man (in the form of their white boss) but because they had been showing up to work late and stealing from the store for months. Sometimes it is what we do, not what has been done to us, that leads to our detriment. Does it then mean that black people really do "suffer deservedly, because they do not take advantage of the opportunities offered them", or are "innately lazy and less intelligent...lack will power...[and prefer] welfare to employment..." (Lipsitz 86)? According to the polls it does.
That aside, what also tires me is when white people get defensive about the effects racism has on their lives. Either they are victims of "reverse discrimination--by which they usually mean race-specific measures designed to remedy existing racial discrimination, that inconvenience or offend whites...", or they are upset at being made to "feel guilty or unduly privileged because of things that happened in the distant past" (86-87). When anyone is dismissive about the legacy that slavery and post-Reconstruction has had (and still haves) on this country I am highly irritated anyway, but to lump all of the exasperation concerning problems plaguing the Black community as "grievances soley with slavery" and that they or their family didn't own slaves negates the reality of the experience black people had/have in this country because of it. What about "racialized social policies, urban renewal, or the revived racism of contempory neoconservatism" (88)? Or how about institutionalized racism, constitutional slavery, Jim Crow and the Black Codes, and all of the other post-Reconstruction practices that have been implemented and have nothing to do with owning slaves?
Not to mention that you didn't have to own slaves to benefit from slavery. As Lipsitz states, "This view [of not owning slaves] never acknowledges how the existence of slavery and the exploitation of black labor after emancipation created opportunities from which immigrants and others benefited, even if they did not personally own slaves" (88). This also applies to people who didn't live during segregation, and don't feel responsible for what their parents or grandparents did. The issue is not if they did anything but whether or not they benefitted from someone else doing it.
On the flip side, these same people never express any concern for what Black people have to live with and had passed down to them. Fear, distrust, anger, shame, pain, depression, etc. are a reality for those who are the descendants of slaves. As a Black person, distancing yourself from slavery means dismissing what your ancestors went through. If you honestly think about it, their ability to endure slavery is the only reason you exist today. Sometimes I really don't think people (white and black) really understand this. Forgetting isn't really an option. I digress...
Monday, January 30, 2012
From Writing for Social Justice Blog (White Privilege)
When I first heard about courses in whiteness studies I scoffed at the idea. We already
study white people. Our textbooks are full of historically notable white people. We read literature written by white people. Whiteness is everywhere. It is in our faces everyday. Why on earth would we need to "study" it? I've come to understand that whiteness needs to be studied precisely because it is in our faces everyday and no one questions it.
Unfortunately, what does get questioned is why "others" feel the need to be different, to define themselves, to create a separate space for their identity. One question I've heard more than once is "Why do they need BET?" as if the very notion of having one channel amongst hundreds that is devoted solely to Black Entertainment is somehow a form of reverse racism. Nevermind the racist conditions that led to the creation of BET, or the lowered standards it seems to now have, just the mere fact that there is still something that is "Black only" is what the problem is.
To me, this is what hooks was talking in her article about the rage that white students had when they listened to the Black students talk about whiteness. The belief that "all ways of looking that highlight difference subvert the liberal belief in a universal subjectivity (we are all just people) that they think will make racism disappear" conflicts with the reality of what nonwhite people have to deal with when it comes to race (21). There were hardly any shows on TV that had Black people in them, and there was no place for Black music videos on MTV (except for Michael Jackson who was the first). BET was created as a space to focus on Black issues, show programs featuring Black actors, and feature music of Black artists. That's why "they" need(ed) BET.
The other thing that caught my attention was the idea of being socialized in the fantasy of Whiteness that hooks and Dyer were talking about. More specifically, the idea that white people believe that black people believe that "whiteness represents goodness and all that is benign and non-threatening" (22). It made me wonder if this and the need to "'civilize and Christianize' the heathen, the savages, the less fortunate" is the view that inner city police take when they enter into poor Black and Latino/a neighborhoods (35). While there is evidence of racism in police brutality, I am wondering if the police truly believe that they are protecting and serving the "other" because they have bought into the fantasy of Whiteness? They are unable to see the reality that their very presence islikened to terrorism (22). I also think that class makes this hard to see as well. Middle class "others" would be more socialized into the fantasy than the working class because their interaction with white people is slightly different and they don't learn to fear them so quickly.
From Computers and Writing Blog (Writing Space)
eBooks are eVil
Just reading the introduction to Bolter's book made me realize just how much of a dinosaur I really am. Bolter's explanation that the "late age of print" is the "transformation of our social and cultural attitudes toward, and uses of, this familiar technology" had me thinking about how much I have really transformed my attitude towards print and digital media. While I have used digital media, and I can appreciate it in it's various forms I am still an old school, book printing
advocate.
For some reason, I just can't agree with digitizing books. I have always preferred to read a book I can hold, write in, smell, and even get a papercut from. The few times I have found a book online I ended up printing it out because I just couldn't sit and read it on the screen. Which is rather curious because I printed the exact same thing that was on the computer screen, but I preferred the printed version anyway. It's not the material that is on the screen, or the way that it is presented that is an issue for me. Apparently, it is just the fact that it is digital that really bothers me (though I'm not too fond of books on tape either). Not to mention that I can't highlight or write notes in the margins of an eBook...at least as far as I know, but I'm sure that will eventually change one of these days.
Quite frankly, eBooks scare me. They just don't make any sense to me. What is the fascination with print needing to be changeable and fluid, or text being linked to other works? So a few trees
are saved. They can be recycled. So what if students won't have to lug around heavy backpacks loaded down with textbooks? They make backpacks with wheels. That curvature of my spine to the left from carrying book laden bags on one shoulder? I can just switch to the right shoulder for balance. What's the big deal? I don't think that eBooks should replace print. Then again, I also prefer handwritten letters to email, and writing in a journal to blogging. Maybe I belong in another time...
Actually, this whole post reminds me of Erykah Badu and how she calls herself an analog girl in a digital world. I was going to post a link to one of her songs, but as I was looking them I up I come to find out there is a country song by Guy Clark called "Analog Girl" as well. A short clip is on YouTube here: http://youtu.be/BAmDlmrAIiY. The lyrics are as follows:
You got to call her when she’s home
All of her clocks have got hands
Now don’t try to e-mail her,
you’ve got to snail mail her
You got to take pen in hand
Ones and zeros, zeros and ones
She’ll have none of that virtual fun
She’s a real deal ol’ fashioned analog girl
In a digital world
Now she gets online out in the backyard
Hangin’ up her ol’ blue jeans
She’s got all of the memory she can live with
She really hates drum machines
Ones and zeros, zeros and ones
She’ll have none of that virtual fun
She’s a real deal ol’ fashioned analog girl
In a digital world
Out in the garden she’s got a website
It sparkles in the mornin’ dew
Got a mouse in her pocket,
she’s got spam in a can
What’s an analog girl to do
Ones and zeros, zeros and ones
She’ll have none of that virtual fun
She’s a real deal ol’ fashioned analog girl
In a digital world
